My Photo

Bulletin Board

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


  • The NIH Keeps Up With The Times: 1, 2, 3. David Baltimore Has A Flashback: ***. The NY Times Keeps Up With Times: ***. The Faith of Anthony Fauci: ***. Anthony Fauci Explains How HIV Causes AIDS: ***. Robert Gallo on The Force of Ejaculation: ***, on HIV Theory: ***, Lectures in Marseilles: ***. David Ho Does The Math: ***. John Mellors Sets the Record Straight: ***. Bono, el Magnifico, Holds (Another) Press Conference: ***. Anthony Fauci Explains Journalism in the Age of AIDS: ***. Anthony Fauci and David Ho Disprove an Old Adage: ***. Anthony Fauci Explains ICL and AIDS: *** The CDC Can't Keep Up With The Times:*** The Method of the "Small Inquisitor" Moore:*** The Co-Discovery of a Nobel-Worthy Enzymatic Activity:*** The Revenge of the "Very" Minor Moriarty:*** Julie Gerberding and Anthony Fauci Learn Arithmetic:*** Osama Obama Has a Message for Africa:***

Bad Manners and Good Gossip

« Hollywood says Good-Bye to AIDS. | Main | More On Moore: Part Deux »

June 18, 2006


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.



Gee Whiz, another unguent to apply before the "deed" is done. Do they come in flavors?? Root Beer perhaps??

Lawstud out.


Happy Father's Day, Hank!

Moore seems like a greedy fellow.


"So, Moore wants the world to apply these pesticides, er, I mean microbicides, on female genitalia before intercourse!"

Rrrroooowwwwrrr!!! Sounds sexy!
I think you're avoiding the erotic possibilities, Hank. Don't be such a sourpuss (no pun intended).

Hey! I've got a solution! Just make sex illegal. The only people that can have sex are married couples who've been tested for every thing under the sun, and are only engaging in intercourse for the express purpose of procreation. I'm serious.


I forgot to add something...there should also be legal consequences to the couple (mostly the woman, though...sorry, but that's how it works)if the woman fails to become pregnant.

Am I being too cynical? 'Cause I don't think this Orwellian nightmare has reached its climax yet.



Do you realize how Freudian your posts are on this string? I rather like it!!



Hi Dan & Lawstud,

Clearly, these AIDS geniuses needed to "sex" AIDS up in order to get gov't $$ for all their silly scientific boondoggles.

Scientifically, there is no reason to link AIDS with sex. Padian debunks heterosex (which most people silently agreed with anyway). But I think it debunks anal sex, too. Based purely on demographics, there are many more women getting buggered than homosexual men.

The AIDS cartel makes $$ and derives power by bymming our collective mojo:)


Even Padian showed that 38% of the heterosexual couples were engaged in anal sex.

If so, then where are all the straight, white, affluent suburban chicks getting AIDS?


noreen martin

Hello Hank,
Great website! I guess my husband and I are missing out on all the fun as we use no protection, flavored or not, and he is HIV negative. Dr. Moore cannot explain couples like us.

I personally feel that the AIDS rethinkers must unite as a group and meet in a major city. We are spread all over the states and the world for that matter and hopping from website to website. We must unite to let our voices be heard and finally get some news coverage!

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • Comments are regarded as letters to the editor. They are subject to the same policies as the NY Times and Nature, and are not published until after editorial review.
Blog powered by Typepad