ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- An HIV test should be almost as common as a cholesterol check, say federal health officials, who Thursday recommended routine testing for the AIDS virus for most Americans…. Under the new guidelines, patients would be tested for the AIDS virus as part of the standard tests they get when they go for urgent or emergency care, or even during a routine physical.
The CDC went on to claim that you can decline the test if you want; but that, of course, is dependant on being given the option. Considering the obscene track record of the medical profession in securing informed consent for previous HIV testing and HAART prescriptions, that should be no consolation.
This isn’t news, however. The CDC has been planning and talking about this for years. Why? They estimate that there are about 1,000,000 people in the U.S. who are HIV-Positive, but, sadly, as many as 300,000 of them might not know it. So to find these 300,000, they want to test all 300,000,000 million Americans for HIV.
Given the 80% false positive reactions on these HIV blood tests, it means that we’re going to tell 1.5 million people they are HIV-Positive to find these 300,000 - which apparently we are doing in about 20 minutes these days, after only one “rapid response” ELISA, with no Western Blot confirmation.
This might be a great way for the CDC to pad their HIV-Positive statistics (“More diagnoses may help win bolstered funding,” said John Peebles, an assistant branch chief over HIV programs at the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources), and a cash cow for the test kit manufacturers (“This certainly expands the rapid HIV testing market," said Ron Spair, chief financial officer of Pennsylvania-based OraSure Technologies, one of three companies that sell rapid-result HIV tests in the United States), but it can’t be good for the 1.2 million who will be told they are HIV-Positive when they aren’t.
The emotional and psychological trauma, the family stress, and the social rejection associated with an HIV test are well documented and quite openly admitted by the AIDS Establishment. But that doesn’t seem to matter. They plow ahead with their plans to ruin the lives of up to 1.5 million people by handing them a death sentence from AIDS (or, more correctly, the AIDS drugs), and killing them just as surely as outside forces murdered 3,000 people on September 11th, 2001.
But that’s not all the AIDS Establishment has in mind. According to a June 27, 2006 op ed piece in the New York Times, The New York City Department of Health is proposing a plan to treat HIV the same way they treated tuberculosis. For those who don’t remember, it went like this: “Thanks to a major infusion of federal financing, New York health officials took an active approach [to tuberculosis], getting as many patients as possible on directly observed therapy, known as D.O.T., in which outreach workers administered tuberculosis medications in clinics, patients' homes and on the street. For patients who ‘failed’ D.O.T., the health department employed forcible detention, either at Bellevue Hospital or at Goldwater Hospital...” where you were “detained” for as long as two years. They called it the “TB Jail.”
So, New York City is proposing the same thing for people who test Positive for HIV but “fail” or refuse to take the prescribed HIV medications, even though there is ample evidence that the medications themselves make people sick. They want to create an “HIV Jail” in Bellevue and lock you away if you don’t comply. Yes, this would include HIV-Positives who had AIDS, but also HIV-Positives who are perfectly healthy, with no symptoms of AIDS or any other disease, who simply didn’t want to take the dangerous HIV drugs.
With terrorist cells like these inside our own borders, who needs Osama?
Stephen Davis is a former Arizona state senator, and the author of Wrongful Death: The AIDS Trial. He can be contacted through his website. (Hank)
Comments